PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2018The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine43 citationsOpen Access

Impact of Medical Scribes in Primary Care on Productivity, Face-to-Face Time, and Patient Comfort

LZLeah ZallmanKFKaren E. FinneganDRDavid Roll

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: Medical scribes are a clinical innovation increasingly being used in primary care. The impact of scribes in primary care remain unclear. We aimed to examine the impact of medical scribes on productivity, time spent facing the patient during the visit, and patient comfort with scribes in primary care. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational pre-post study of 5 family and internal medicine-pediatrics physicians and their patients at an urban safety net health clinic. Medical scribes accompanied providers in the examination room and documented the clinical encounter. After an initial phase-in period, we added an additional 20-minute patient slot per 200-minute session. We examined productivity by using electronic medical record data on the number of patients seen and work relative value units (work RVUs) per hour. We directly observed clinical encounters to measure the amount of time providers spent facing patients and other visit components. We queried patient comfort with scribes by using surveys administered after the visit. Results: Work RVUs per hour increased by 10.5% from 2.59 prescribe to 2.86 post-scribe (P P P P = .003). The proportion of the visit time that was spent face-to-face increased by 39% (P P Conclusions: Although the full implications of medical scribe implementation remain to be seen, this initial study highlights the promising opportunity of medical scribe implementation in primary care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zallman et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16a31ff7fa259786b24959https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170325
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper