Key result
Extended personalized cardiac models terminate ~41% of initially sustained reentries, better matching clinical measurements.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether simulating induced arrhythmias for just a few seconds in personalized cardiac models is sufficient to match the arrhythmias detected in patients.
Does a 10-second simulation time compared to 3 seconds improve the stability and clinical match of induced reentries in personalized cardiac models of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Does a 10-second simulation time compared to 3 seconds improve the stability and clinical match of induced reentries in personalized cardiac models of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Extending personalized cardiac modeling simulations to 10 seconds reveals that many reentries stable at 3 seconds are actually non-sustained or unstable, improving the match with clinical measurements.
May refine reentry stability in cardiac models; leaves open clinical translation for ischemic cardiomyopathy risk stratification.
Personalized cardiac modeling is widely used for studying the mechanisms of cardiac arrythmias. Due to the high demanding of computational resource of modeling, the arrhythmias induced in the models are usually simulated for just a few seconds. In clinic, it is common that arrhythmias last for more than several minutes and the morphologies of reentries are not always stable, so it is not clear that whether the simulation of arrythmias for just a few seconds is long enough to match the arrhythmias detected in patients. This study aimed to observe how long simulation of the induced arrhythmias in the personalized cardiac models is sufficient to match the arrhythmias detected in patients. A total of 5 contrast enhanced MRI datasets of patient hearts with myocardial infarction were used in this study. Then, a classification method based on Gaussian mixture model was used to detect the infarct tissue. For each reentry, 3 s and 10 s were simulated. The characteristics of each reentry simulated for different duration were studied. Reentries were induced in all 5 ventricular models and sustained reentries were induced at 39 stimulation sites in the model. By analyzing the simulation results, we found that 41% of the sustained reentries in the 3 s simulation group terminated in the longer simulation groups (10 s). The second finding in our simulation was that only 23.1% of the sustained reentries in the 3 s simulation did not change location and morphology in the extended 10 s simulation. The third finding was that 35.9% reentries were stable in the 3 s simulation and should be extended for the simulation time. The fourth finding was that the simulation results in 10 s simulation matched better with the clinical measurements than the 3 s simulation. It was shown that 10 s simulation was sufficient to make simulation results stable. The findings of this study not only improve the simulation accuracy, but also reduce the unnecessary simulation time to achieve the optimal use of computer resources to improve the simulation efficiency and shorten the simulation time to meet the time node requirements of clinical operation on patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tong et al. (2021) studied Ischemic cardiomyopathy with myocardial infarction (n=5). 10-second simulation of induced arrhythmias vs. 3-second simulation was evaluated on Termination of sustained reentries in extended simulation. Extending personalized cardiac model simulations from 3 to 10 seconds resulted in the termination of 41% of initially sustained reentries, matching clinical measurements better.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: