A ring idempotent e∈R is said to be quarter-central (or q-central for short) if e R (1−e) R e=0. If all idempotents in a ring R are q-central, R is said to be a quarter-abelian ring (or more simply, a q-abelian ring). In this paper, we show that such a ring R is characterized by the property that [ e,R ] [e,R ]=0 for all idempotents e∈R, where [x,y] denotes the additive commutator xy−yx. For any nonzero ring S and any integer n≥3, we show that the ring Tn(S) of n×n upper triangular matrices over S is not q-abelian. On the other hand, T2(S) is q-abelian iff S is abelian (in the classical sense that all idempotents are central in S). A final section of this paper relates q-central idempotents to the notion of exchange rings and the study of regular, unit-regular, and strongly regular elements in arbitrary rings. From the viewpoint of currently prevailing generalizations of abelian rings in the literature, q-abelian rings are situated between the class of semiabelian rings and the class of strongly IC rings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. Y. Lam (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: