Key result
An analysis of 35 surgical short-term medical mission articles revealed poor documentation of safety standards, with only 14.3% documenting informed consent and 2.9% documenting WHO time out procedures.
Systematic Review (n=35)
Surgical short-term medical missions lack consistent documentation of safety practices and outcomes, highlighting the need for standardized international safety guidelines.
Short-term surgical missions warrant caution amid safety gaps; leaves open whether outcomes meet international standards.
The global burden of surgical disease is on the rise. In underserved areas this need is being increasingly met by surgical short-term medical missions (STMMs). However, access to safe surgical care is still of great concern to global health advocates. We sought to evaluate the current safety practices and outcomes of surgical care being provided by STMMs. We looked at 35 primary research papers from surgical STMMs between 1991-2016 and analyzed their documentation of safety standards and follow up procedures. This led us to two important conclusions: 1 -surgical STMM practices and outcomes are not well documented and 2 -there is a need for standardized safety guidelines when participating in surgical STMMs. Here we introduce an actionable set of international surgical safety standards that we invite all short-term surgeons and groups to utilize as a means of setting a foundation for the practice of safe surgery on mission trips.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner et al. (2017) conducted a systematic review in Surgical short-term medical missions (n=35). Surgical short-term medical missions (STMMs) was evaluated on Documentation of safety standards and follow-up procedures. An analysis of 35 surgical short-term medical mission articles revealed poor documentation of safety standards, with only 14.3% documenting informed consent and 2.9% documenting WHO time out procedures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: