Three simplifying methodds are discussed and applied to the four lowest valence states of CH 2 ( 3 B 1 , 1 A 1 , 1 B 1 and 1 Σ ( 1 A )) and to the two lowest of CH ( 2 A 1 and 2 ∏ u ( 2 B 1 )). These methods concern: (1) the development of polarization functions for Gaussian‐lobe basis sets by least‐square fitting of numebrical multiconfigurational atomic fuinctions (this approach is tested also on (C 2 H 2 , (2) the use of intermediate Hamiltonians to calculate avoided crossings between potential hypersurfaces, and (3) thecalculation of correlation energies using an atoms‐in‐molecule approach. The calculated equilibrium geometries of the CH 2 States are within 0.02 Å and 5° of available experimental data. The calculated term values and ionization potentials, T e ( 1 A 1 = 0.35 eV, T e ( 1 B 1 ) = 1.22 eV, T e ( 1 Σ ( 1 A )) 2.48 eV, I.P. ( 2 A 1 ) = 10.39 eV and I. P. ( 2 ∏ u ( 2 B 1 )) = 10.58 eV, are in agreement with some recent theoretical studies, and are very close to existing experimental information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gervy et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: