Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
IPv6 over Low power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN) and IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy networks (RPL) have accelerated the integration of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and smart objects with the Internet. At the same time, the development of the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) has made it possible to provide resource constrained devices with web service functionalities. CoAP is an HTTP like web transfer protocol able to extend the REpresentational State Transfer (REST) architecture to LoWPANs. The major difference between CoAP and HTTP is the different transport layer protocol (UDP instead of TCP) and the header compression which makes the packet size significantly smaller. This work provides an evaluation of CoAP compared to HTTP. The performance is evaluated in terms of mote's energy consumption and response time. The aim of the paper is to demonstrate, with a quantitative and qualitative analysis, that CoAP is more suited to REST based WSNs compared to HTTP. The results have been obtained by means of simulation as well as tests on real sensor motes.
Colitti et al. (Sat,) studied this question.