This study examines how companies’ voluntary adoption of a particular CSR framework affects their managers’ decision‐making, especially when they are faced with a dilemma whereby maximising environmental benefits means a reduction in financial returns. The results show that investment in CSR projects is significantly higher when companies report under a stand‐alone CSR reporting framework, as this framework provides the opportunity to highlight the benefits of CSR investment. In contrast, an integrated reporting framework encourages disclosure of benefits and costs, whereas the financial statement framework limits disclosure of CSR activities, and both result in lower investment in CSR projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: