This paper argues that the history of embodiment of human racial and gendered differences must be seen as part of the history of liberal citizenship and its limits. The author suggests that a science of similarity and difference can never be a reliable guide to questions of rights. The consequences of this conclusion for our understanding of science and the gendered body are addressed in the second half of the paper, in an effort to clear the way for a more adequate and inclusionary model of citizenship and rights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nancy Leys Stepan (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: