Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
One of the key-metaphors in conceptualizing national identity is that of the nation as a body or a person. Nation-embodiment and -personalization have had a long conceptual history spanning more than two millennia and still figure prominently in present-day political discourse. Both the target and source-domains have changed considerably over time, so it may be asked in which sense the metaphor has remained the same. New evidence from an interpretation survey conducted in 30 countries in 2011–2020 suggests that this conceptual metaphor functions at two levels, i.e., 1) an abstract general mapping and 2) pragmatically enriched “scenarios” that lead to creative applications. As evidence for such scenarios, the article presents data from Slavic L1 survey samples that illustrate the interplay between the matrix mappings and innovative meaning aspects that are grounded in culture-specific discourse traditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Андреас Мусолфф (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: