This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVES: Describe the injury risk of English youth basketball, comparing game versus training injury incidence and burden. DESIGN: 5 season (2013/14-2018/19) prospective cohort study. SETTING: Basketball academy at an English sports college. PARTICIPANTS: Male basketball players (n = 110, mean age; 17.3 ± 0.9 years). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Descriptive data regarding game and training injury incidence (injuries per 1000 athlete-exposures (AE)) and burden (severity x incidence) are provided with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Rate ratios (RR; 95% CI) were used to compare outcome measures, with results statistically significant if the 95% CI did not pass 1.0. RESULTS: Fifty-four injuries were sustained during 13,350-AE (1666 games, 9684 training). Game injury incidence (12.0/1000-AE, 95% CI 6.7-17.3) was significantly greater than training injury incidence (2.4/1000-AE, 95% CI 1.4-3.3; RR = 5.1, 95% CI 2.8-9.2). Games had a significantly greater injury burden (216 days absence/1000-AE, 95% CI 121-311) than training (62 days absence/1000-AE, 95% CI 37-88; RR = 3.5, 95% CI 1.9-6.3). The ankle was the most injured body location (37%), whilst over 50% of injuries occurring through contact mechanisms. CONCLUSION: This study is the most comprehensive description of injury epidemiology in English youth basketball to date. This information can inform evidence-based injury prevention strategies to mitigate risk in this population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barden et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: