The deterministic motions of clouds and turbulence, despite their chaotic nature, have nonetheless been shown to follow simple statistical power-law scalings: a fractal dimension D relates individual cloud perimeters p to a measurement resolution, and turbulent fluctuations scale with the air parcel separation distance through the Hurst exponent, ℋ. However, it remains uncertain whether atmospheric turbulence is best characterized by a split isotropy that is three-dimensional (3D) with H=1/3 at small scales and two-dimensional (2D) with ℋ=1 at large scales or by a wide-range anisotropic scaling with an intermediate value of ℋ. Here, we introduce an “ensemble fractal dimension” De – analogous to D – that relates the total cloud perimeter per domain area 𝒫 as seen from space to the measurement resolution, and we show theoretically how turbulent dimensionality and cloud edge geometry can be linked through H=De-1. Observationally and numerically, we find the scaling De∼5/3 or H∼2/3, spanning 5 orders of magnitude of scale. Remarkably, the same scaling relationship links two “limiting case” estimates of 𝒫 evaluated at resolutions corresponding to the planetary scale and the Kolmogorov microscale, which span 10 orders of magnitude. Our results are nearly consistent with a previously proposed “23/9D” anisotropic turbulent scaling and suggest that the geometric characteristics of clouds and turbulence in the atmosphere can be easily tied to well-known planetary physical parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rees et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: