Key result
Medical management of primary pulmonary hypertension, including vasodilator therapy and anticoagulation, is reviewed regarding available compounds, mode of action, administration, and efficacy.
This review provides an update on the medical management of primary pulmonary hypertension, focusing on vasodilator therapy and anticoagulation.
Offers clinicians a synthesis of vasodilator and anticoagulant options in primary pulmonary hypertension; leaves open questions on optimal regimens pending new trials.
Primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) is a poorly understood, progressive disease that is characterized by elevation of pulmonary artery pressure and vascular resistance, leading to right ventricular failure and death within 2-3 yrs after diagnosis. Based upon the concept that vasoconstriction and thrombotic occlusion of resistance vessels precipitate this process, vasodilator therapy and anticoagulation have become the main strategies for improving survival in these patients. Whereas, a few years ago, medical therapy of primary pulmonary hypertension was perceived as a bridging therapy to lung or heart lung transplantation, modes of therapy are being clinically tested at this time to offer an alternative to the surgical treatment of this disease. However, no selective pulmonary vasodilator is yet available. Therefore, and because of the potential hazards of vasodilator treatment, standardized haemodynamic testing is performed prior to initiation of vasodilator treatment. In this update, the currently available compounds both for haemodynamic testing and chronic therapy, their mode of action, method of administration and efficacy are reviewed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kneussl et al. (1996) conducted a review in Primary pulmonary hypertension. Vasodilator therapy and anticoagulation was evaluated. Medical management of primary pulmonary hypertension, including vasodilator therapy and anticoagulation, is reviewed regarding available compounds, mode of action, administration, and efficacy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: