Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Monte-Carlo method is the method of choice for accurate yield estimation. Standard Monte-Carlo methods suffer from a huge computational burden even though they are very accurate. Recently a Monte-Carlo method was proposed for the parametric yield estimation of digital integrated circuits ,that achieves significant computational savings at no loss of accuracy by focusing on those statistical variables that have a significant impact on yield. We adapt this technique to the context of analog circuit yield estimation. The inputs to the proposed method are the designable parameters, the uncontrollable statistical variations, and the operating conditions of interest. The technique operated on digital integrated circuits estimates yield using a linear model for process variations. In our work we first convexify the non-linear design constraints to obtain a convex feasible region. We then consider an accurate polytope-approximation of the convex feasible region by taking tangent hyperplanes at various points on the surface of the convex region. The hyper planes give rise to a matrix of sensitivities, which is then used to glean information about the importance of variables for yield estimation. Finally the knowledge of which design variables are very important for yield estimation is used to allow the Monte-Carlo technique achieve a lower error compared to standard Monte-Carlo in the same amount of simulation time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kondamadugula et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: