Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and related disorders, such as insulin resistance, pose significant health risks in middle-aged women, including cognitive decline. Chronic inflammation, characterized by elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), has been identified as a key mechanism linking metabolic disturbances to neurodegenerative processes. Methods: This study aimed to examine the associations between metabolic disorders, inflammatory markers, and cognitive function among middle-aged women. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 179 non-smoking perimenopausal and postmenopausal women aged 43–73 years. Anthropometric, metabolic, and cognitive parameters were assessed, including body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), fasting glucose (GLU), triglycerides (TG), IL-6, TNF-α, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Logistic regression models were applied to evaluate the relationships between inflammation, MetS components, and cognitive impairments. Results: Women with insulin resistance showed significantly worse metabolic profiles and lower MMSE scores (23.98 vs. 24.91, p = 0.032). IL-6 levels were strongly associated with hypertriglyceridemia (OR = 1.096, 95% CI: 1.044–1.151, p < 0.001) and insulin resistance (OR = 1.068, 95% CI: 1.030–1.107, p < 0.001), while TNF-α correlated with abdominal obesity (WHtR OR = 1.429, 95% CI: 1.005–2.031, p = 0.047). Moreover, TNF-α was a significant predictor of cognitive impairments (OR = 1.362, 95% CI: 1.153–1.610, p < 0.001), whereas IL-6 showed no significant association. Conclusions: These findings highlight that TNF-α may be a key inflammatory marker associated with metabolic disturbances and cognitive decline in middle-aged women. IL-6 appears to be more specifically linked to lipid abnormalities and insulin resistance. Targeted interventions to reduce inflammation may moderate metabolic and cognitive risks in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mruczyk et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: