This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
It is known that host cells can produce type I IFNs (IFN-alphabeta) after exposure to conserved bacterial products, but the functional consequences of such responses on the outcome of bacterial infections are incompletely understood. We show in this study that IFN-alphabeta signaling is crucial for host defenses against different bacteria, including group B streptococci (GBS), pneumococci, and Escherichia coli. In response to GBS challenge, most mice lacking either the IFN-alphabetaR or IFN-beta died from unrestrained bacteremia, whereas all wild-type controls survived. The effect of IFN-alphabetaR deficiency was marked, with mortality surpassing that seen in IFN-gammaR-deficient mice. Animals lacking both IFN-alphabetaR and IFN-gammaR displayed additive lethality, suggesting that the two IFN types have complementary and nonredundant roles in host defenses. Increased production of IFN-alphabeta was detected in macrophages after exposure to GBS. Moreover, in the absence of IFN-alphabeta signaling, a marked reduction in macrophage production of IFN-gamma, NO, and TNF-alpha was observed after stimulation with live bacteria or with purified LPS. Collectively, our data document a novel, fundamental function of IFN-alphabeta in boosting macrophage responses and host resistance against bacterial pathogens. These data may be useful to devise alternative strategies to treat bacterial infections.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mancuso et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: