Key result
Various pacing modalities appear to suppress atrial tachyarrhythmias in only a minority of patients, with no clear benefit shown in several randomized trials.
Why the study?
Do various pacing modalities prevent atrial tachyarrhythmias in drug-refractory patients?
Do various pacing modalities prevent atrial tachyarrhythmias in drug-refractory patients?
Pacing modalities may suppress atrial tachyarrhythmias in a small subset of drug-refractory patients, but routine use is limited by the inability to prospectively identify responders.
Does not support routine pacing for atrial tachyarrhythmia prevention in drug-refractory patients; leaves open identification of potential responders.
INTRODUCTION: Pacing has been proposed as a nonpharmacologic treatment option to prevent atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) in drug-refractory patients. This article reviews the current state of pacing to prevent ATs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Different pacing modalities have been assessed with regard to their ability to prevent AT: conventional DDDR pacing with elevated lower rate limit, biatrial pacing, dual-site right atrial pacing, atrial septal pacing, and pacing with the use of dedicated pacing algorithms. Small studies suggest a benefit of conventional pacing for AT prevention in patients with bradycardia, but a randomized trial did not reveal any AT reduction by conventional pacing in patients without bradycardia. AT prevention by biatrial or dual-site right atrial pacing has been reported in small studies, but randomized trials did not show a clear benefit of these pacing techniques. Small studies showed a reduced AT recurrence rate in patients with septal pacing at the triangle of Koch or at Bachmann's bundle. Two large randomized trials with preventive pacing algorithms showed a significant AT reduction compared to conventional pacing, but this was not confirmed in four trials. CONCLUSION: Pacing seems to be able to suppress ATs in a minority of patients; however, prospective identification of responders to different pacing modalities does not appear to be feasible at the present time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Israel et al. (2003) conducted a review in Atrial tachyarrhythmias. Pacing modalities (conventional, biatrial, dual-site right atrial, atrial septal, dedicated algorithms) was evaluated on Prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Various pacing modalities appear to suppress atrial tachyarrhythmias in only a minority of patients, with no clear benefit shown in several randomized trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: