Treating low- and intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia with and without chemotherapy: A comparison in a tertiary care center

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

Background: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) comprises approximately 10% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. Material and Methods: Both options of treatment (ATRA–ATO and ATRA–chemotherapy) were discussed with patients with low- and intermediate-risk APL, pros and cons explained in details, and treatment regimen selected after getting informed written consent. Results: Total 71 patients were included in the study; among these patients, 3 were negative for both FISH for t (15,17) and RT-PCR for promyelocytic leukemia retinoic acid receptor alpha, and 36 patients with APL had white blood cell count at diagnosis >10 × 10 9 /l. Total 30 patients with newly diagnosed as low- and intermediate-risk-APL fulfilled all inclusion criteria, treated and followed for a minimum period of 2 years up to June, 2016. Fifteen patients liked to be treated with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO), while rest of the 15 patients preferred treatment with ATRA and chemotherapy. Conclusion: Combination of ATRA and ATO is equally effective, less toxic, and more feasible in comparison to ATRA and chemotherapy for patients with low- and intermediate-risk APL and is a viable option for this subset of patients, especially in countries with limited resources.