Key result
Clinical imaging and electrophysiological studies support the myocardial mesh model of ventricular architecture over the unique myocardial band model.
Clinical imaging and electrophysiological studies support the myocardial mesh model of ventricular architecture over the unique myocardial band model.
Two of the leading concepts of mural ventricular architecture are the unique myocardial band and the myocardial mesh model. We have described, in an accompanying article published in this journal, how the anatomical, histological and high-resolution computed tomographic studies strongly favour the latter concept. We now extend the argument to describe the linkage between mural architecture and ventricular function in both health and disease. We show that clinical imaging by echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging, and electrophysiological studies, all support the myocardial mesh model. We also provide evidence that the unique myocardial band model is not compatible with much of scientific research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacIver et al. (2017) conducted a review in Mural ventricular architecture. Myocardial mesh model vs. Unique myocardial band model was evaluated. Clinical imaging and electrophysiological studies support the myocardial mesh model of ventricular architecture over the unique myocardial band model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: