Key result
This scoping review protocol outlines a methodology to examine how published studies define and measure unnecessary psychiatric readmissions following discharge from inpatient mental healthcare.
Why the study?
It is unclear how studies define postdischarge readmissions as a transition quality measure, and whether there is a shared understanding regarding which definition is appropriate.
This scoping review protocol outlines a methodology to examine how published studies define and measure unnecessary psychiatric readmissions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol for standardizing unnecessary psychiatric readmission definitions may refine quality metrics; leaves open clinical application pending completed review.
INTRODUCTION: Care transition for patients being discharged from inpatient mental healthcare to outpatient settings is a growing focus for healthcare delivery systems. Many studies of this inpatient to outpatient transition use the rate of postdischarge readmissions as a patient-level outcome measure to assess the quality of transition. However, it is unclear how studies define the measure, and whether there is a shared understanding by the field regarding which definition is appropriate for which circumstances. This scoping review thus aims to examine how published studies have approached measuring unnecessary psychiatric readmissions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 's enhancement to Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews. The protocol is registered through the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/5nxuc/). We will search literature databases for studies that (1) are about care transition processes associated with unnecessary psychiatric readmissions and (2) specify use of at least one readmission time interval (ie, time period since previous discharge from inpatient care, within which a hospitalisation can be considered a readmission). Screening and review of articles will be carried out by two reviewers, first independently then involving a third reviewer as needed for consensus. We will assess review findings through both tabular and thematic analyses, noting prevalent trends in study characteristics and emergent themes across our reviewed studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This work comes at a time of heightened interest by many mental healthcare systems in high-quality practices that structure their care processes towards effective inpatient to outpatient transitions. Findings will support the systems' careful examination of alternative potential transitional interventions, helping to ensure that their often limited quality enhancement resources are put to optimal use. We will focus on disseminating our findings to the healthcare community through strong communication infrastructures and connections with health system stakeholders that our multidisciplinary study consultants will foster throughout this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) conducted a review in Psychiatric readmissions. Scoping review of readmission measurement was evaluated on Approaches to measuring unnecessary psychiatric readmissions. This scoping review protocol outlines a methodology to examine how published studies define and measure unnecessary psychiatric readmissions following discharge from inpatient mental healthcare.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: