PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 27, 2014Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology94 citations

Users’ perspectives on the provision of assistive technologies in Bangladesh: awareness, providers, costs and barriers

View Full Paper
JBJohan BorgPÖPer‐Olof Östergren

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to contribute to a better understanding of challenges and solutions to equitable provision of assistive technologies in resource limited environments by (i) describing sources of awareness, types of providers and costs of assistive technologies; (ii) describing common reasons for not possessing assistive technologies; and (iii) comparing these sources, providers, costs and reasons among younger and older men and women living in urban and rural settings. METHODS: Descriptive and analytic statistics were used to analyze cross-sectional data from a total sample of 581 hearing aid users, wheelchair users, individuals with hearing impairments not using hearing aids and individuals with ambulatory impairments not using wheelchairs living in eight districts of Bangladesh. RESULTS: Major sources of awareness, types of providers and costs paid varied between users of different types of assistive technology. Lack of affordability was the main reason for not possessing assistive technology. Outcome differences were found between younger and older groups, men and women, and literate and illiterate respondents, while no differences related to place of living were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Age, gender, type of impairment and socioeconomic status need to be considered when planning and implementing equitable provision of assistive technologies. Implications for Rehabilitation Provision of assistive technologies needs to be made affordable as lack of affordability was the major reason for not possessing such technologies. To ensure equitable provision of assistive technology, services ought to consider age, gender, impairment and socioeconomic status of their target groups. This includes offering a range of products of different sizes provided by culturally appropriate personnel at affordable cost, which to many may be at no or reduced cost. To cater to the assistive technology needs among the most vulnerable groups, assistive technology providers may learn from CBR strategies, such as, awareness raising and service delivery at community level, the use of local resources, collaboration and coordination, and the consideration of cultural factors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Borg et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16dcd3c7240d1a707bb54fhttps://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.974221
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1User involvement in service delivery predicts outcomes of assistive technology use: A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh2012 · 58 citations
  2. 2Assistive technology use is associated with reduced capability poverty: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh2011 · 54 citations
  3. 3Disability and participation in post‐conflict situations: the case of Sierra Leone2006 · 47 citations
  4. 4Facilitating Student Achievement with Assistive Technology2007 · 62 citations
  5. 5SPSS Survival Manual2020 · 3,039 citations