Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A German sentence test was developed which is comprised of 20 test lists of ten sentences each. The test corpus is a selection from sentences for speech quality evaluation recorded with a male unschooled speaker. Performance-intensity curves were measured for each individual sentence in a speech-simulating babble noise with a total of 40 normal-hearing listeners. Based on these data and the phonemic transcription of the 200 sentences selected from the underlying speech corpus, 20 test lists were composed using a numerical optimization process. These 20 test lists are highly equivalent with respect to their performance-intensity curves, the number of words within each test list, the number of phonemes within each test list, and approximately the frequency distribution of the phonemes which approximates the phoneme frequency distribution of the German language. The equivalence of the respective performance-intensity curves was demonstrated in an independent experiment with 20 normal-hearing listeners. In addition, a comparison was performed between the "objective" intelligibility measurements and two "subjective" speech intelligibility rating methods employing the same materials. As a result, both subjective assessment procedures correlate highly with each other and with the "objective" procedure across sentences. This underlines the applicability and validity of the test in combination with time-saving subjective assessment methods. Moreover, the variability in performance across different sentences correlates inversely with the RMS level of the respective sentence. This indicates that an adjustment of sentence material with respect to RMS level already yield reasonably homogeneous test material with respect to intelligibility.
Kollmeier et al. (Wed,) studied this question.