Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the predictive diagnostic value of affective symptomatology in a first-episode psychosis (FEP) sample with 5 years' follow-up. METHOD: Affective dimensions (depressive, manic, activation, dysphoric) were measured at baseline and 5 years in 112 FEP patients based on a factor structure analysis using the Young Mania Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Patients were classified as having a diagnosis of bipolar disorder at baseline (BDi), bipolar disorder at 5 years (BDf), or "other psychosis". The ability of affective dimensions to discriminate between these diagnostic groups and to predict a bipolar disorder diagnosis was analysed. RESULTS: Manic dimension score was higher in BDi vs. BDf, and both groups had higher manic and activation scores vs. "other psychosis". Activation dimension predicted a bipolar diagnosis at 5 years (odds ratio=1.383; 95% confidence interval, 1.205-1.587; P=0.000), and showed high levels of sensitivity (86.2%), specificity (71.7%), positive (57.8%) and negative predictive value (90.5%). Absence of the manic dimension and presence of the depressive dimension were both significant predictors of an early misdiagnosis. CONCLUSION: The activation dimension is a diagnostic predictor for bipolar disorder in FEP. The manic dimension contributes to a bipolar diagnosis and its absence can lead to early misdiagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arrasate et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: