Present-day electronic databases of fungal names are 21st century versions of previous compilations for the same purpose. The comprehensive indices attached to books by Persoon and Fries summarized names known at those times. Later compilations appeared piecemeal in journals or free-standing, always improving but hardly available for “rapid retrieval.” Twentieth century Index of Fungi required tedious data entry from thousands of journals over many years, but the result could later be inserted into electronically retrievable computer programs. Index Fungorum includes data harvested from Index of Fungi , but perhaps its major source has been Saccardo’s Sylloge Fungorum , probably the most prodigious compilation of the 19 th –20 th century. Names for lichen-forming fungi were gleaned from the catalogues of Zahlbruckner and Lamb. The role of the Commonwealth Mycological Institute, its predecessors and its successors, has been significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petersen et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: