We consider methods for estimation of the integral of a given function that combine the unbiasedness of Monte Carlo integration (which permits a simple statistical assessment of the error) with the higher precision often attained by deterministic methods. We propose symmetric random designs with $2k + 1$ points that achieve exactness for polynomials of degree up to $2k + 1$. The distribution for the three-point method is unique, although for higher order methods there are multiple choices for the sampling distribution. For two-dimensional multiple integration over a rectangle, we propose an unbiased five-point method that achieves exactness for polynomials of degree up to three in both variables. Some bounds on error variances are given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siegel et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: