Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Aims: Aim was to review reports of clozapine-related reactions fulfilling the registry of severe cutaneous adverse reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria for DRESS syndrome reported as such or otherwise, to provide a descriptive overview of demographic patterns, clinical manifestations, and DRESS course and investigate associations between demographic, DRESS parameters, and clinical outcomes. Methods: This review was conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020156385). We searched PubMed/Embase/PsychInfo/Cochrane for reports of clozapine-related reactions meeting RegiSCAR criteria. Associations between RegiSCAR scores and time-to-recovery with demographic/clinical variables were assessed. Demographic/clinical characteristics of patients with versus without reported DRESS were compared using non-parametrical tests. Results: We identified 26 reports of 27 patients meeting RegiSCAR criteria. Males ( n = 19, 70.4%) and patients with schizophrenia ( n = 18, 66.7%) were mainly affected. Twelve patients (44.4%) received clozapine-monotherapy. DRESS symptoms manifested within a month after clozapine initiation ( n = 24, 88.9%). Lungs and liver were the most common organs involved ( n = 12, 44.4%; n = 11, 40.7%), with a mean time to recovery of 33.75 days. Clozapine rechallenge led to DRESS recurrence in four patients. Death rate was 7.4%. No associations were detected between RegiSCAR criteria or days to recovery with any demographic/clinical variables. No differences between patients with versus without reported DRESS were detected. Conclusions: Clozapine-related DRESS may be rare, but also underreported. Clinicians need to be aware of it even in patients under clozapine-monotherapy or without skin rash.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filippis et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: