Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
1-D and 2-D LC methods were utilized for proteome analysis of undepleted human serum. Separation of peptides in 2-D LC was performed either with strong cation exchange (SCX)-RP chromatography or with an RP-RP 2-D LC approach. Peptides were identified by MS/MS using a data-independent acquisition approach. A peptide retention prediction model was used to highlight the potential false-positive peptide identifications. When applying selected data filtration, we identified 52 proteins based on 316 peptides in serum in 1-D LC setup. One hundred and eighty-four proteins/1036 peptides and 142 proteins/905 peptides were identified in RP-RP and SCX-RP 2-D LC, respectively. The performance of both 2-D LC methods for proteomic analysis is critically compared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilár et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: