PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1999Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics128 citations

Measuring Psychotherapeutic Change with the Symptom Checklist SCL 90 R

View Full Paper
HSHenning SchauenburgUniversität HamburgMSMicha StrackUniversity of Göttingen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a long tradition of discussions on the evaluation of psychotherapy, there is still a lack of agreement for measuring change after psychological treatment. In this paper we describe the concept of statistical and clinical significance of change. We use the Symptom Checklist 90 R as a commonly administered instrument to propose conventions and cutoff points for psychological symptoms and their change after therapy. METHOD: A German norm population and several psychotherapy samples have been aggregated to calculate cutoffs and confidence intervals (reliable change indices) for statistically and clinically significant changes after psychotherapy. RESULTS: The cutoff point between a 'functional' and a 'dysfunctional' population was calculated as C = 0.57 (Global Severity Index, GSI). Patients above this score need a change of at least RCI = 0.43 (GSI difference) for a statististically significant change. Below this score the RCI = 0.16. The use of multiple clinical groups (e.g. inpatients and outpatients) for a more realistic determination of a 'stepwise' clinically significant change, as proposed by Tingey et al. in the USA, is not possible in the German samples collected so far. Initial SCL 90-R scores in these groups do not show enough differences to call a move from one group to the other a clinically significant change. CONCLUSION: In the German samples investigated the move from a 'functional' to a 'dysfunctional' population and vice versa has to be taken as the criterion for a clinically significant change up to now.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schauenburg et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16fb787cba52b0f77bcbe8https://doi.org/10.1159/000012333
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessing the Clinical or Applied Importance of Behavior Change through Social Validation1977 · 1,120 citations
  2. 2Interpersonal Problems as Predictors of Symptom Related Treatment Outcome in Longterm Psychotherapy1996 · 68 citations
  3. 3Assessing Clinical Significance: Proposed Extensions to Method1996 · 205 citations
  4. 4Statistics for assessing the clinical significance of psychotherapy techniques: Issues, problems, and new developments.1988 · 176 citations
  5. 5Research in Psychotherapeutic Diagnosis and the Concept of Socio-Empirical Markers1997 · 5 citations