PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1994Cancer38 citationsOpen Access

Cellular DNA content and survival in advanced ovarian carcinoma

View Full Paper
JPJacobus PfistererFKFriedrich KommossWSWilli Sauerbrei

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer is generally poor. To date, no satisfactory methods for predicting individual prognosis have been reported, especially in patients with little or no residual tumor after debulking. METHODS: The authors investigated in a retrospective study the prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content as measured by flow cytometry of the tumor specimens from 184 women with nonpretreated International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage III and IV ovarian cancer. Clearly defined inclusion criteria for the study population were used. RESULTS: Seventy-one (39%) cancers were diploid, whereas 113 (61%) were aneuploid. Ploidy showed a significant correlation with clinical and morphologic features such as age, histologic grade, serous histologic type, and residual tumor after debulking. No significant correlation was found between ploidy and ascites, estrogen- and progesterone receptor levels, and elevated pretreatment CA-125 levels. Univariate analysis showed significant correlations between overall survival and histologic grade (P = 0.003), patient age (P = 0.001), residual tumor after primary surgery (P < 0.001), stage (P = 0.019) and ploidy (P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis revealed residual tumor (P < 0.001) and age (P = 0.051) to be associated independently with survival. Ploidy was not established as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that abnormalities of the nuclear DNA content in advanced ovarian carcinomas are associated with various clinical and morphologic prognosticators, but that ploidy is not an independent prognostic factor for survival.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pfisterer et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16fd4eb082e78ad77bc16fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9<2509::aid-cncr2820740919>3.0.co;2-f
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content in malignant epithelial tumors of the ovary1990 · 64 citations
  2. 2Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry.1983 · 2,056 citations
  3. 3Radiofrequency capacitive hyperthermia for deep-seated tumors. I. Studies on thermometry1987 · 136 citations
  4. 4Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations1992 · 45,552 citations
  5. 5Influence of cellular DNA content on survival in ovarian carcinoma.1989 · 47 citations