Key result
Magnitude-based field mapping matches complex-based reference methods and withstands inhomogeneities over 400 Hz.
Why the study?
Does the proposed magnitude-based field mapping method accurately estimate field inhomogeneity compared to a reference complex-based method in MRI subjects?
Does the proposed magnitude-based field mapping method accurately estimate field inhomogeneity compared to a reference complex-based method in MRI subjects?
The proposed magnitude-based field mapping method provides accurate and robust field inhomogeneity estimation, demonstrating potential for improved water-fat separation in MRI.
May simplify 3T field mapping in practice; leaves open clinical impact on water-fat separation pending larger trials.
Magnitude-based PDFF (Proton Density Fat Fraction) and R 2 ∗ mapping with resolved water-fat ambiguity is extended to calculate field inhomogeneity (field map) using the phase images. The estimation is formulated in matrix form, resolving the field map in a least-squares sense. PDFF and R 2 ∗ from magnitude fitting may be updated using the estimated field maps. The limits of quantification of our voxel-independent implementation were assessed. Bland-Altman was used to compare PDFF and field maps from our method against a reference complex-based method on 152 UK Biobank subjects (1.5 T Siemens). A separate acquisition (3 T Siemens) presenting field inhomogeneities was also used. The proposed field mapping was accurate beyond double the complex-based limit range. High agreement was obtained between the proposed method and the reference in UK. Robust field mapping was observed at 3 T, for inhomogeneities over 400 Hz including rapid variation across edges. Field mapping following unambiguous magnitude-based water-fat separation was demonstrated in-vivo and showed potential at 3 T.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagur et al. (2023) studied this question. Magnitude-based field mapping using phase images vs. Reference complex-based method was evaluated on Agreement of PDFF and field maps using Bland-Altman analysis. Magnitude-based field mapping using phase images demonstrated high agreement with a reference complex-based method and was robust for inhomogeneities over 400 Hz at 3 T.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: