Key result
Epicardial mapping signal analysis classifies AF inducibility during sinus rhythm with ~92% accuracy.
Why the study?
Treatment of AF becomes increasingly difficult as the disease deteriorates, making early prediction and intervention critical to curbing progression.
Can epicardial mapping signals during sinus rhythm accurately assess atrial fibrillation inducibility in a canine model?
Can epicardial mapping signals during sinus rhythm accurately assess atrial fibrillation inducibility in a canine model?
Epicardial mapping signals during sinus rhythm can accurately assess atrial fibrillation vulnerability in a canine model, potentially aiding early prediction.
Should not inform clinical practice; hypothesis-generating for epicardial AF prediction in canine models.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinic, which can cause hemodynamic changes, heart failure and stroke, and seriously affect human life and health. As a self-promoting disease, the treatment of AF can become more and more difficult with the deterioration of the disease, and the early prediction and intervention of AF is the key to curbing the deterioration of the disease. Based on this, in this study, by controlling the dose of acetylcholine, we changed the AF vulnerability of five mongrel dogs and tried to assess it by analyzing the electrophysiology of atrial epicardium under different states of sinus rhythm. Here, indices from four aspects were proposed to study the atrial activation rule. They are the variability of atrial activation rhythm, the change of the earliest atrial activation, the change of atrial activation delay and the left-right atrial dyssynchrony. By using binary logistic regression analysis, multiple indices above were transformed into the AF inducibility, which were used to classify the signals during sinus rhythm. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of classification reached 85.7%, 95.8% and 91.7%, respectively. As the experimental results show, the proposed method has the ability to assess the AF vulnerability of atrium, which is of great clinical significance for the early prediction and intervention of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2020) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=5). Epicardial mapping signal analysis was evaluated on Classification of AF inducibility. Epicardial mapping signal analysis using atrial activation indices classified atrial fibrillation inducibility during sinus rhythm with 85.7% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity, and 91.7% accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: