Key result
Home-based cardiac rehab for CAD mirrors center-based programs in implementation and core components.
Why the study?
Although cardiac rehabilitation benefits CAD patients, participation and adherence remain low, prompting the need to explore the implementation of home-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Does home-based cardiac rehabilitation provide comparable benefits to center-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease?
Does home-based cardiac rehabilitation provide comparable benefits to center-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease?
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation is a safe, feasible, and equally effective alternative to center-based programs for patients with coronary artery disease, potentially improving participation and adherence.
May guide home-based program setup for coronary artery disease; leaves open comparative efficacy and adherence outcomes.
Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the major cause of disability and death worldwide. The cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program is the management strategy for CAD patients with exercise as the main component to increase functional capacity. This program has been proven beneficial in reducing mortality and morbidity due to CAD. It also reduced the healthcare burden and improved the quality of life. Although the benefits of CR are widely proven, participation and adherence of CAD patients to this program are low. The home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) program is the strategy developed to increase the coverage of CR services. This program is equally effective as center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) and is considered safe. This review aimed to find out more about the HBCR program with a focus on its implementation in CAD patients. Methods: Original articles and systematic or narrative reviews were searched using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Research Gate databases. Further exploration of literature citations was also done to meet the inclusion criteria needed to explain the topic. Results: Compared to CBCR, the HBCR program provide comparable benefits, both in medical and functional outcomes. The HBCR program is proven to be feasible and safe with better adherence. The components of the HBCR program are generally the same as the CBCR program and direct supervision given in the CBCR program can be replaced by remote supervision through communication devices or home visits. Conclusion: The HBCR program can be used as an alternative to CBCR in managing patients with CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazir et al. (2023) conducted a review in Coronary Artery Disease. Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation (HBCR) vs. Center-based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) was evaluated. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary artery disease is implemented similarly to center-based programs, involving screening, assessment, exercise prescription, monitoring, and evaluation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: