Key result
Doppler-derived pulse pressure differentiates CPTE from primary pulmonary hypertension with ~95% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Can noninvasive Doppler ultrasound measurement of normalized pulse pressure differentiate chronic pulmonary thromboembolism from primary pulmonary hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=35)
Can noninvasive Doppler ultrasound measurement of normalized pulse pressure differentiate chronic pulmonary thromboembolism from primary pulmonary hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.82% vs 0.63%
p-value: p=< 0.01
Doppler ultrasound-derived normalized pulse pressures provide a highly sensitive and specific noninvasive method to differentiate chronic pulmonary thromboembolism from primary pulmonary hypertension.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to differentiate chronic pulmonary thromboembolism (CPTE) from primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) by using noninvasive Doppler ultrasound techniques. BACKGROUND: A recent investigation in our laboratory has indicated that the pulmonary artery (PA) pressure waveform conveys significant information that can be used to differentiate CPTE from PPH. Pulse pressure was markedly larger in CPTE than in PPH, indicating that the major occlusive site is central in CPTE and peripheral in PPH. METHODS: In 19 patients with CPTE and 16 patients with PPH, we estimated PA systolic pressure and diastolic pressure from the velocities of tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation, respectively. RESULTS: Estimated systolic pressure was not significantly different between CPTE and PPH (mean [+/-SD] 81+/-20 and 79+/-21 mm Hg, respectively, p=NS). Pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure was higher in CPTE than in PPH (0.82+/-0.05 vs. 0.63+/-0.10, respectively, p < 0.01). Pulse pressure normalized by mean pressure was also higher in CPTE than in PPH (1.65+/-0.30 vs. 0.94+/-0.25, respectively, p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure separated CPTE from PPH, with a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 1.00. Pulse pressure normalized by mean pressure also separated them, with a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: Normalized pulse pressures estimated from Doppler ultrasound measurements enable us to noninvasively differentiate between CPTE and PPH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakayama et al. (1998) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic pulmonary thromboembolism and primary pulmonary hypertension (n=35). Doppler ultrasound measurement of normalized pulse pressure vs. Primary pulmonary hypertension was evaluated on Pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure (p=< 0.01). Doppler ultrasound measurement of pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure differentiated chronic pulmonary thromboembolism from primary pulmonary hypertension (sensitivity 0.95, specificity 1.00).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: