Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This is the third paper in a series that reports on our investigation of the clustering properties of AGNs identified in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). In this paper, we extend the redshift range to 0.07<z<0.50 and measure the clustering amplitudes of both X-ray and optically-selected SDSS broad-line AGNs with and without radio detections as well as for X-ray selected narrow-line RASS/SDSS AGNs. We measure the clustering amplitude through cross-correlation functions (CCFs) with SDSS galaxies and derive the bias by applying a halo occupation distribution (HOD) model directly to the CCFs. We find no statistically convincing difference in the clustering of X-ray and optically-selected broad-line AGNs, as well as with samples in which radio-detected AGNs are excluded. This is in contrast to low redshift optically-selected narrow-line AGNs, where radio-loud AGNs are found in more massive halos than optical AGNs without a radio-detection. The typical dark matter halo masses of our broad-line AGNs are log M_DMH/[h^(-1) M_SUN] ~ 12.4-13.4, consistent with the halo mass range of typical non-AGN galaxies at low redshifts. We find no significant difference between the clustering of X-ray selected narrow-line AGNs and broad-line AGNs. We confirm the weak dependence of the clustering strength on AGN X-ray luminosity at a ~2 sigma level. Finally, we summarize the current picture of AGN clustering to z~1.5 based on three dimensional clustering measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krumpe et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: