PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 7, 2016Frontiers in Microbiology245 citationsOpen Access

Bacillus cereus Biofilms—Same, Only Different

RMRacha MajedCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCFChristine FailleCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMKMireille KallassySaint Joseph University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Bacillus cereus displays a high diversity of lifestyles and ecological niches and include beneficial as well as pathogenic strains. These strains are widespread in the environment, are found on inert as well as on living surfaces and contaminate persistently the production lines of the food industry. Biofilms are suspected to play a key role in this ubiquitous distribution and in this persistency. Indeed, B. cereus produces a variety of biofilms which differ in their architecture and mechanism of formation, possibly reflecting an adaptation to various environments. Depending on the strain, B. cereus has the ability to grow as immersed or floating biofilms, and to secrete within the biofilm a vast array of metabolites, surfactants, bacteriocins, enzymes, and toxins, all compounds susceptible to act on the biofilm itself and/or on its environment. Within the biofilm, B. cereus exists in different physiological states and is able to generate highly resistant and adhesive spores, which themselves will increase the resistance of the bacterium to antimicrobials or to cleaning procedures. Current researches show that, despite similarities with the regulation processes and effector molecules involved in the initiation and maturation of the extensively studied Bacillus subtilis biofilm, important differences exists between the two species. The present review summarizes the up to date knowledge on biofilms produced by B. cereus and by two closely related pathogens, Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus anthracis. Economic issues caused by B. cereus biofilms and management strategies implemented to control these biofilms are included in this review, which also discuss the ecological and functional roles of biofilms in the lifecycle of these bacterial species and explore future developments in this important research area.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Majed et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1719b42fcf950e0005a8a0https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01054
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Attachment of different soil bacteria to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal extraradical hyphae is determined by hyphal vitality and fungal species2005 · 274 citations
  2. 2Inactivation and removal of Bacillus cereus by sanitizer and detergent2002 · 216 citations
  3. 3Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology1987 · 4,009 citations
  4. 4What problems does the food industry have with the spore-forming pathogens Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens?1995 · 411 citations
  5. 5Evaluation of the effect of cleaning regimes on biofilms of thermophilic bacilli on stainless steel2003 · 131 citations