This paper describes the use of CyclePad—an articulate virtual laboratory for creating and analyzing thermodynamics cycles—at three different types of educational institutions: a research university, an engineering technology program in a large state university, and a military academy. Case studies of each site were created based on classroom observations, student surveys, and interviews with faculty. In comparing these three institutions, we found that the context of the school and the ways in which professors chose to implement CyclePad led to different student experiences. Depending on the types of problems that students worked on, they found the software more or less helpful in increasing their understanding of thermodynamics. Students in the class that had the most constraints on its curriculum, where little change was possible, were less able to take full advantage of the software's capabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Baher (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: