Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Reliable time-series forecasting under rapidly changing conditions remains a critical challenge across many domains, particularly in healthcare, where physiological signals are inherently dynamic and uncertain. Blood glucose level prediction exemplifies this challenge, as accurate and timely forecasts are essential for effective diabetes management, yet traditional approaches rely on fixed prediction horizons and single-point estimates, which may yield unreliable decisions under rapidly changing physiological conditions. In this work, we propose a novel approach for adaptive horizon selection, applied to BGL prediction, employing a deep learning model. It employs evidential learning-based uncertainty quantification that decompose uncertainty into epistemic and aleatoric. Each set of models is trained to predict blood glucose levels at different future time steps, each providing both a point prediction and an associated uncertainty measure. At inference time, it dynamically balances predictive accuracy and reliability by selecting the longest horizon whose predicted uncertainty remains below a predefined threshold. This enables confidence-based horizon selection, using longer prediction horizons during stable periods and switching to shorter horizons when uncertainty signals critical glucose events requiring immediate intervention. This uncertainty-aware prediction approach promotes transparency by exposing confidence levels alongside predictions. Applicable to time-series forecasting tasks broadly, the proposed framework demonstrates encouraging potential, and when applied to BGL prediction as a representative clinical case, shows particular promise for supporting glycemic management through calibrated uncertainty estimation, offering a more transparent and interpretable alternative to fixed-horizon models toward trustworthy decision support in diabetes care.
Ghimire et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: