Higher numbers of pulsed field ablation applications (≥57) significantly reduced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 1 year compared to standard applications (<57) (8% vs. 29%; p<0.01).
Cohort (n=177)
Does a higher number of pulsed field ablation (PFA) applications reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing first-time AF ablation?
A higher number of pulsed field ablation applications (≥ 57) during first-time AF ablation is associated with significantly reduced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 1 year without increasing procedure time or complication rates.
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 29%
p-value: p=<0.01
ABSTRACT Background The optimal number of pulsed field ablation (PFA) applications during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear. We hypothesized that the number of PFA applications would predict atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence rates. Objective To determine whether higher numbers of PFA applications would decrease ATA recurrence rates. Methods We studied cases of patients with AF undergoing first‐time ablation with PFA between 5/6/24 and 10/7/24. All patients underwent pulmonary vein and posterior wall isolation. The primary outcome was ATA recurrence. Additional outcomes included stroke, post‐procedural acute kidney injury (AKI), total procedure time, and major periprocedural complications. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine if the number of PFA applications predicted ATA recurrence. Results In a cohort consisting of 177 patients, univariable and multivariable analysis showed that the number of PFA applications split at the smallest quartile (< 57 applications) versus the largest three quartiles (≥ 57 applications) was the strongest predictor of ATA recurrence ( p = 0.03). ATA recurrence at 1 year (29% vs. 8%; p < 0.01) and AF burden on continuous monitor (4% vs. 0%; p < 0.01) was higher with the standard (< 57 applications) vs higher (≥ 57 applications) PFA dose groups. When comparing the standard versus higher PFA dose groups, there was no difference in total procedure time (106 vs. 107 min; p = 0.77), major periprocedural complications (0% vs. 2%; p = 0.33), or post‐procedural AKI (2% vs. 2%; p = 0.69). Conclusion Increasing number of PFA applications is associated with reduced ATA recurrence. A higher number of PFA applications may decrease ATA recurrence without affecting procedure times or complication rate.
Junarta et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=177). Higher number of pulsed field ablation (PFA) applications vs. Standard number of PFA applications (< 57 applications) was evaluated on Atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence (p=<0.01). Higher numbers of pulsed field ablation applications (≥57) significantly reduced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 1 year compared to standard applications (<57) (8% vs. 29%; p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: