PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2021Critical Care Explorations33 citationsOpen Access

Explainable Machine Learning on AmsterdamUMCdb for ICU Discharge Decision Support: Uniting Intensivists and Data Scientists

PTPatrick ThoralAmsterdam NeuroscienceMFMattia FornasaResMed (Netherlands)DBDaan P. de BruinAmsterdam University College

Key Result

An explainable Gradient Boosting machine learning model predicted ICU readmission or death within 7 days of discharge with an AUROC of 0.78, potentially enabling a 14% relative risk reduction.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=18,034)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does an explainable machine learning model accurately predict the composite of ICU readmission or death within 7 days of ICU discharge in adult ICU patients?

P
Population
18,034 adult patients (14,105 in derivation cohort, 3,929 in validation cohort) admitted to a mixed surgical-medical academic ICU. Exclusions: ICU admissions longer than 30 days, palliative care patients, patients with do-not-resuscitate or do-not-intubate orders, and patients transferred to other hospitals.
I
Intervention
Explainable machine learning-based real-time bedside decision support tool (Gradient Boosting/XGBoost algorithm) utilizing 180 features including patient characteristics, clinical observations, physiologic measurements, laboratory studies, and treatment data.
O
Outcome
Composite of ICU readmission and/or death, both within 7 days of ICU discharge.composite

An explainable machine learning model using routinely collected ICU data demonstrated good discrimination for predicting 7-day post-discharge readmission or mortality, potentially enabling targeted discharge management to reduce relative risk by 14%.

Main Result

Effect estimate: AUROC 0.78 (95% CI 0.75-0.81)

Limitations

  • Single-center study, lacking validation on data from other hospitals.
  • Targeting a 7-day window may include late complications rather than just early preventable readmissions.
  • Predicting and preventing readmissions may not influence outcomes in all healthcare systems.
  • Counterfactual predictions (estimating outcome probability assuming the patient had been discharged) may lead to incorrect conclusions.
  • The model learns human subjectivity, preferences, and biases of the intensivists practicing at the center.
  • Single-center study
  • Targeted readmissions and mortality until 7 days after ICU discharge instead of the 2-day quality indicator

Abstract

Unexpected ICU readmission is associated with longer length of stay and increased mortality. To prevent ICU readmission and death after ICU discharge, our team of intensivists and data scientists aimed to use AmsterdamUMCdb to develop an explainable machine learning-based real-time bedside decision support tool. DERIVATION COHORT: Data from patients admitted to a mixed surgical-medical academic medical center ICU from 2004 to 2016. VALIDATION COHORT: Data from 2016 to 2019 from the same center. PREDICTION MODEL: Patient characteristics, clinical observations, physiologic measurements, laboratory studies, and treatment data were considered as model features. Different supervised learning algorithms were trained to predict ICU readmission and/or death, both within 7 days from ICU discharge, using 10-fold cross-validation. Feature importance was determined using SHapley Additive exPlanations, and readmission probability-time curves were constructed to identify subgroups. Explainability was established by presenting individualized risk trends and feature importance. RESULTS: = 3,929). The most predictive features included common physiologic parameters but also less apparent variables like nutritional support. At a 6% risk threshold, the model showed a sensitivity (recall) of 0.72, specificity of 0.70, and a positive predictive value (precision) of 0.15. Impact analysis using probability-time curves and the 6% risk threshold identified specific patient groups at risk and the potential of a change in discharge management to reduce relative risk by 14%. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an explainable machine learning model that may aid in identifying patients at high risk for readmission and mortality after ICU discharge using the first freely available European critical care database, AmsterdamUMCdb. Impact analysis showed that a relative risk reduction of 14% could be achievable, which might have significant impact on patients and society. ICU data sharing facilitates collaboration between intensivists and data scientists to accelerate model development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thoral et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Critically ill patients (ICU admissions) (n=18,034). Explainable machine learning model (Gradient Boosting) was evaluated on ICU readmission and/or death within 7 days of ICU discharge (AUROC 0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.81). An explainable Gradient Boosting machine learning model predicted ICU readmission or death within 7 days of discharge with an AUROC of 0.78, potentially enabling a 14% relative risk reduction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1734c9d17772c818bb88dchttps://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000000529
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Patients readmitted to the intensive care unit during the same hospitalization1998 · 170 citations
  2. 2The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets2015 · 5,110 citations
  3. 3Readmission to Medical Intensive Care Units: Risk Factors and Prediction2015 · 63 citations
  4. 4Readmissions and Death after ICU Discharge: Development and Validation of Two Predictive Models2012 · 120 citations
  5. 5Readmission to intensive care: development of a nomogram for individualising risk2010 · 47 citations