How can we navigate complex power dynamics in our every-day interactions, while sourcing our collective powers for a just transition to equitable, regenerative economies where we all get to be alive, well, and free? How can we disrupt the politics of trauma and cultivate a politics of flourishing? This article explores how an inner-compass, the “Vitality Triangle,” can help us meet these challenges by living our questions while embodying, embedding, and emplacing three principles of regenerative vitality in living systems: liberty, reciprocity, and integrity. The Vitality Triangle is not a new theory; it is a heuristic diagram informed by diverse lineages of thought and action that can help us cultivate ecosystem awareness as we navigate from the life-threatening conditions characterizing our current geological epoch to geographies of radical resilience. The article brings attention to academic and paradigmatic assumptions regarding ontology, sovereignty/power, epistemology, and cartography that have contributed to a downward spiral of degenerative socio-ecological relationships, as depicted by the “Precarity Triangle.” The Vitality Triangle supports shifts in consciousness conducive to an upward spiral of regenerative relationships in dynamic, co-evolving living systems. The Vitality Triangle builds upon and complements Theory U as an awareness-based approach to systems change. It shares core ontological assumptions with Theory U, including an understanding that form follows consciousness, and therefore, shifting from ego-system to ecosystem awareness represents a powerful leverage point for systems change, regenerating vitality across scales in nested living systems – from bodies and the body politic, to the ecosystems of which we are part.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walsh et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: