Key result
DXA assessment of subcutaneous adipose tissue strongly correlated with MRI in older adults (r=0.92) and children (r=0.90), whereas agreement for visceral adipose tissue was weaker.
Why the study?
Given the importance of body fat distribution in chronic disease development, feasible methods to assess body fat are essential.
Does DXA accurately measure visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compared to MRI in older adults and children?
Observational (n=2,104)
Does DXA accurately measure visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compared to MRI in older adults and children?
DXA provides a reliable measure of subcutaneous adipose tissue comparable to MRI in children and older adults, but its agreement for visceral adipose tissue is weaker, particularly in individuals with low VAT levels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DXA may offer a practical SAT surrogate in older adults and children; leaves open its reliability for VAT versus MRI.
Objective Given the importance of body fat distribution in chronic disease development, feasible methods to assess body fat are essential. This study compared dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) in measuring visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods VAT and SAT were assessed using similar DXA and MRI protocols among 1,795 elderly participants of the Adiposity Phenotype Study (APS) and 309 children/adolescents in Shape Up! Kids (SKids). Spearman correlations, Bland–Altman plots, and coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) assessed agreement between DXA and MRI measures. Results DXA overestimated SAT values in APS (315 vs. 229 cm 2 ) and SKids (212 vs. 161 cm 2 ), whereas DXA underestimated VAT measures (141 vs. 167 cm 2 ) in adults only. The correlations between DXA and MRI values were stronger for SAT than VAT (APS: r = 0.92 vs. 0.88; SKids: 0.90 vs. 0.74). Bland–Altman plots confirmed better agreement for SAT than VAT despite differences by sex, ethnicity, and weight status with respective R 2 values for SAT and VAT of 0.88 and 0.84 (APS) and 0.81 and 0.69 (SKids). Conclusion These findings indicate that SAT by DXA reflects MRI measures in children and older adults, whereas agreement for VAT is weaker for individuals with low VAT levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maskarinec et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Body fat distribution (n=2,104). Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) vs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated on Agreement between DXA and MRI measures of VAT and SAT (r=0.92 for SAT, r=0.88 for VAT (APS)). DXA assessment of subcutaneous adipose tissue strongly correlated with MRI in older adults (r=0.92) and children (r=0.90), whereas agreement for visceral adipose tissue was weaker.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: