Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The 2020 launch of Pop! Public. Open. Participatory <https://popjournal.ca> . <https://popjournal.ca> by the Canadian Institute for Studies in Publishing promised a âpost-digital journal of the public humanities.â Then the pandemic hit, and Pop! became a research prototype interested in establishing a âsimplest possibleâ model, workflow, and technology stack for an OA journal in the humanities. Over the past three years, Pop! has explored and elaborated a set of possibilities that cut through much âaccepted wisdomâ and dogma about how journals need to be operated â from how the peer review process is handled (largely offline) to how production, metadata, and publication technologies (markdown, YAML, static site, & minimal task-specific XML) are employed. Rather than adopt â or, god forbid, develop â a journal-management CMS, Pop! aims to discern a minimum-viable feature set for a robust, scholar-led, OA journal while foregrounding a relation of care between authors, editors, reviewers, and readers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John W. Maxwell (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: