Key result
Nordic hamstring exercises fail to alter hamstring muscle activity or relative contribution versus control.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a Nordic hamstring exercise intervention on biceps femoris long head, semitendinosus, and semimembranosus muscle activity and relative contributions.
Does a 12-week Nordic hamstring exercise intervention improve normalized muscle activity and relative contribution of hamstring muscles in injury-free male basketball players?
RCT (n=24)
randomly assigned
Does a 12-week Nordic hamstring exercise intervention improve normalized muscle activity and relative contribution of hamstring muscles in injury-free male basketball players?
A 12-week Nordic hamstring exercise intervention does not significantly alter the level of muscle activity or relative contribution of hamstring muscles during the exercise in male basketball players.
Nordic hamstring exercises do not increase hamstring activation in basketball players; challenges neuromuscular adaptation assumptions from this intervention.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a Nordic hamstring exercise intervention on biceps femoris long head, semitendinosus, and semimembranosus muscle's activity and relative contributions through multichannel electromyography. Twenty-four injury-free male basketball players (mean age 20 [3] y) were randomly assigned to a 12-week intervention (n = 13) or control group (n = 11). The primary outcome measures were normalized muscle activity (percentage of maximal voluntary isometric contraction, %MVIC) and relative contribution of hamstring muscles over 12 weeks. No effects were found on any of the primary outcome measures. Between-group differences over 12 weeks were 2.7%MVIC (95% confidence interval 95% CI, -0.7 to 6.1) for the biceps femoris long head, 3.4%MVIC (95% CI, -1.4 to 8.2) for the semitendinosus, and 0.8%MVIC (95% CI, -3.0 to 4.6) for the semimembranosus, P = .366. Between-group differences over 12 weeks were 1.0% relative contribution (%con; 95% CI, -3.0 to 5.1) for the biceps femoris long head, 2.2% relative contribution (95% CI, -2.8 to 7.2) for the semitendinosus, and -3.3% relative contribution (95% CI, -6.4 to -0.1) for the semimembranosus P = .258. A positive value implies a higher value for the Nordic group. A Nordic hamstring exercise intervention did not affect the level of muscle activity and relative contribution of hamstring muscles in performance of the Nordic hamstring exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suskens et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Injury-free male basketball players (n=24). Nordic hamstring exercise vs. Control group was evaluated on Normalized muscle activity (%MVIC) and relative contribution of hamstring muscles (Difference 2.7 %MVIC (biceps femoris long head), 95% CI -0.7 to 6.1, p=.366). A 12-week Nordic hamstring exercise intervention did not significantly affect the level of muscle activity or relative contribution of hamstring muscles compared to control (P=0.366).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: