PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2001Journal of Clinical Oncology499 citations

Risk Factors for Recurrence and Metastasis After Breast-Conserving Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ: Analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853

View Full Paper
NBNina BijkerJPJohannes L. PeterseLDLuc Duchateau

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: In view of the increasing number of patients treated with breast-conserving treatment (BCT) for ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS), risk factors for recurrence and metastasis should be identified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical and pathologic characteristics from patients with DCIS in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10853 (excision with or without radiotherapy) were related to the risk of recurrence. Pathologic features were derived from a central review of 863 of the 1,010 randomized cases (85%). The median follow-up was 5.4 years. RESULTS: Factors associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in the multivariate analysis were young age (< or = 40 years) (hazard ratio, 2.14; P =.02), symptomatic detection of DCIS (hazard ratio, 1.80; P =.008), growth pattern (solid and cribriform) (hazard ratios, 2.67 and 2.69, respectively; P =.012), involved margins (hazard ratio, 2.07; P =.0008), and treatment by local excision alone (hazard ratio, 1.74; P =.009). The risk of invasive recurrence was not related to the histologic type of DCIS (P =.63), but the risk of distant metastasis was significantly higher in poorly differentiated DCIS compared with well-differentiated DCIS (hazard ratio, 6.57; P =.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with poorly differentiated DCIS have a high risk of distant metastasis after invasive local recurrence. Margin status is the most important factor in the success of BCT for DCIS; additionally, young age and symptomatic detection of DCIS have negative prognostic value.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bijker et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17436f5c24d7ef898d77ebhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.8.2263
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast1996 · 705 citations
  2. 2Regression Models and Life-Tables1992 · 26,661 citations
  3. 3[Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853].2001 · 459 citations
  4. 4A comparison of the results of long-term follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast1990 · 377 citations
  5. 5Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Female Breast1992 · 159 citations