This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
While inland freshwater networks cover less than 4% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, these ecosystems play a disproportionately large role in the global cycles of [C]arbon, [N]itrogen, and [P]hosphorus, making streams and rivers critical regulators of nutrient balance at regional and continental scales. Foundational studies have established the relative importance of the hydrologic regime, land cover, and instream removal processes for controlling the transport and processing of C, N, and P in river networks. However, particulate C, N, and P can make up a large proportion of the total material in large rivers and during high flows. To constrain the patterns of the biogeochemistry of riverine particulates, we characterized and modeled dissolved and particulate concentration variability at the continental scale using open‐access data from 27 National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) sites across the United States. We analyzed these data using Boosted Regression Trees (BRTs) to statistically identify if land cover characteristics could predict nutrient quantity and quality of stream particulates. The BRT models revealed that land cover does not strongly predict particulate dynamics across NEON sites but indicate that instream processes might be more important than catchment characteristics alone. In addition, our study demonstrates the consistent importance of particulates relative to dissolved forms, highlighting their likely significance for biogeochemical processes along the freshwater continuum.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trost et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: