Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract The dissolution of synthetic magnetite, maghemite, hematite, goethite, lepidocrocite, and akaganeite was faster in HCl than in HClO 4 . In the presence of H + , the Cl − ion increased the dissolution rate, but the ClO 4 − ion had no effect, suggesting that the formation of Fe-Cl surface complexes assists dissolution. The effect of temperature on the initial dissolution rate can be described by the Arrhenius equation, with dissolution rates in the order: lepidocrocite > magnetite > akaganeite > maghemite > hematite > goethite. Activation energies and frequency factors for these minerals are 20.0, 19.0, 16.0, 20.3, 20.9, 22.5 kcal/mole and 5.8 × 10 11 , 1.8 × 10 10 , 7.4 × 10 7 , 5.1 × 10 10 , 2.1 × 10 10 , 3.0 × 10 11 g Fe dissolved/m 2 /hr, respectively. The complete dissolution of magnetite, maghemite, hematite, and goethite is well described by the cube-root law, whereas that of lepidocrocite is not.
Sidhu et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: