This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether proactive telephone support improves adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and clinical outcomes when compared to standard care. METHODS: A multisite, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 109 ART-naive subjects coenrolled in AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 384. Subjects received standard clinic-based patient education (SC) or SC plus structured proactive telephone calls. The customized calls were conducted from a central site over 16 weeks by trained registered nurses. Outcome measures (collected over 64 weeks) included an ACTG adherence questionnaire and 384 study endpoints. RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, self-reported adherence, a significantly better overall treatment effect was observed in the telephone group (P = 0.023). In a post hoc analysis, composite adherence scores, taken as the first 2 factor scores from a principal components analysis, also found significant intervention benefit (P = 0.023 and 0.019 respectively). For the 384 primary study endpoint, time to regimen failure, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the telephone group remained above the SC group at weeks 20 to 64; a Cox proportional hazard model that controlled for baseline RNA stratification, CD4, gender, age, race/ethnicity, and randomized ART treatment arm suggested the telephone group tended to have a lower risk for failure (hazard ratio = 0.68; 95% confidence interval: 0.38 to 1.23). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that customized, proactive telephone calls have good potential to improve long-term adherence behavior and clinical outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reynolds et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: