Key result
In-stent restenosis after BMS is linked to a ~332% surge in circulating CD34-positive cells.
Why the study?
The inflammatory response after vascular injury is hypothesized to trigger mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial and smooth muscle progenitor cells, but this process after coronary stenting is not fully understood.
Does the type of coronary stent (bare-metal vs sirolimus-eluting) affect the mobilization of CD34-positive bone marrow-derived cells in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
Cohort (n=40)
Does the type of coronary stent (bare-metal vs sirolimus-eluting) affect the mobilization of CD34-positive bone marrow-derived cells in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
Bare-metal stenting induces mobilization of CD34-positive bone marrow cells, which is associated with restenosis, whereas sirolimus-eluting stents suppress this mobilization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CD34+ mobilization after stenting may signal restenosis risk; leaves open whether progenitor modulation improves stent outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Recently, accumulating evidence has indicated that bone marrow-derived stem cells are capable of differentiating into vascular cells. It has been hypothesized that the inflammatory response after vascular injury triggers the mobilization of endothelial and smooth muscle progenitor cells from bone marrow. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured circulating CD34-positive mononuclear cells, activation of integrin Mac-1 on the surface of neutrophils, and plasma granulocyte-colony stimulating factor levels in 40 patients undergoing coronary stenting. After bare-metal stenting, CD34-positive cells increased, reaching a maximum on day 7 after stenting. The maximum change compared with baseline before stenting was more striking in patients with restenosis than without restenosis (332+/-108% versus 148+/-49%; P<0.05). In contrast, CD34-positive cells decreased after sirolimus-eluting stenting (72+/-21% on day 7). The change in CD34-positive cells on day 7 relative to baseline was closely correlated with that in activated Mac-1 at 48 hours (R=0.52, P<0.01) and that in granulocyte-colony stimulating factor levels at 24 hours (R=0.42, P<0.05). Cell culture assay on day 7 showed that mononuclear cells differentiated into CD31-positive endothelium-like cells after bare-metal stenting. In patients with restenosis, mononuclear cells differentiating into alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive smooth muscle-like cells also were observed. Implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents suppressed both types of differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Stent implantation may induce differentiation of bone marrow cells into endothelial or smooth muscle cells. Endothelial cells may participate in reendothelialization, a protective reaction against vascular injury, whereas smooth muscle cells may participate in neointimal thickening and restenosis. Sirolimus-eluting stents appear to inhibit the mobilization and differentiation of bone marrow cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inoue et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring stenting (n=40). Coronary stenting (bare-metal vs sirolimus-eluting) vs. Patients without restenosis was evaluated on Maximum change in CD34-positive cells compared with baseline before stenting (p=<0.05). After bare-metal stenting, the maximum increase in CD34-positive cells was significantly greater in patients with restenosis than without (332% vs 148%; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: