We investigate the optimality of (1+∈ )-approximation algorithms obtained via the dimensionality reduction method. We show that: --Any data structure for the (1+∈ )-approximate nearest neighbor problem in Hamming space, which uses constant number of probes to answer each query, must use n^{Ω ( {1/ ∈ ^2 } )} space. --Any algorithm for the (1+∈ )-approximate closest substring problem must run in time exponential in 1/ ∈ 2 - γ for any γ > 0 (unless 3SAT can be solved in subexponential time) Both lower bounds are (essentially) tight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andoni et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: