In engineering problems, design space approximation using accurate computational models may require conducting a simulation for each explored working point, which is often not feasible in computational terms. For problems with numerous parameters and computationally demanding simulations, the possibility of resorting to multi-fidelity surrogates arises as a means to alleviate the effort by employing a reduced number of high-fidelity and expensive simulations and predicting a much cheaper low-fidelity model. A multi-fidelity approach for design space approximation is therefore proposed, requiring two different designs of experiments to assess the best combination of surrogate models and an intermediate meta-modeled variable. The strategy is applied to the prediction of condensation that occurs when two humid air streams are mixed in a three-way junction, which occurs when using low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation to reduce piston engine emissions. In this particular case, most of the assessed combinations of surrogate and intermediate variables provide a good agreement between observed and predicted values, resulting in the lowest normalized mean absolute error (3.4%) by constructing a polynomial response surface using a multi-fidelity additive scaling variable that calculates the difference between the low-fidelity and high-fidelity predictions of the condensation mass flow rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galindo et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: