Key result
A pharmacist-led electronic visit program decreased extreme INR values from 4.8% to 0.01% (p=0.01) and reduced HbA1c by 3.4 percentage points (p<0.001) compared to baseline.
Why the study?
Does a pharmacist-led electronic visit program improve clinical outcomes, financial margins, and patient satisfaction in adults with uncontrolled diabetes or on warfarin?
Observational (n=36)
Does a pharmacist-led electronic visit program improve clinical outcomes, financial margins, and patient satisfaction in adults with uncontrolled diabetes or on warfarin?
A pharmacist-led electronic visit program for diabetes and warfarin monitoring significantly improved clinical outcomes and generated positive financial margins.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for pharmacist e-visits in diabetes and warfarin; prospective trials needed before adoption.
Results of a study evaluating quality-of-care, financial, and patient satisfaction outcomes of pharmacist-conducted telehealth visits for diabetes management and warfarin monitoring are reported. A retrospective pre–post study was conducted to determine the impact of an electronic visit (e-visit) program targeting 2 groups of outpatients: adults with uncontrolled diabetes and warfarin-treated adults performing patient self-testing (PST) for monitoring of International Normalized Ratio (INR) values. A total of 36 patients participated in the e-visit program during the 2-year study period. Among warfarin-treated patients, the percentage of INR values in the desired range increased relative to preenrollment values (from 62.5% to 72.7%, p = 0.07), and the frequency of extreme INR values (values of <1.5 or >5.0) decreased (from 4.8% to 0.01%, p = 0.01); the margin per patient was $300 during the first year and $191 annually thereafter. In the diabetes group, a decrease from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin values of 3.4 percentage points was observed at 5.7 months after enrollment (p < 0.001), with significant improvements in frequencies of statin use, aspirin use, and blood pressure control; the margin was $100 per patient. The overall median patient satisfaction survey score was 39 of 40. An online e-visit model for warfarin monitoring was an efficient, safe, and cost-effective method for implementing PST. Pharmacist-led management of diabetes through e-visits, often in combination with in-person visits, generated revenue while significantly improving clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hawes et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Uncontrolled diabetes and warfarin therapy (n=36). Pharmacist-led electronic visit (e-visit) program vs. Preenrollment baseline was evaluated on Percentage of INR values in the desired range (p=0.07). A pharmacist-led electronic visit program decreased extreme INR values from 4.8% to 0.01% (p=0.01) and reduced HbA1c by 3.4 percentage points (p<0.001) compared to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: